Consistent methodology
Participating firms provide client-level data in a common format using a published methodology.
Institutional OCIO benchmarks
Objective, net-of-fee performance benchmarks built from client-level data reported by leading OCIO firms.
A question about the comparison? Discuss a benchmark with Alpha →

Your portfolio. Independent context.
See where your returns sit among institutional portfolios, compare results across periods, and find the questions to bring to your next investment review.
01 / Choose your comparison
July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2026
Cumulative return · net of all fees
Use the return reported for the exact dates above. Longer periods require an annualized return.
Returns are net of all fees for the reporting period shown.
See whether your peer-relative standing differs over time. Enter only the periods you have, all ending June 30, 2026.
July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2026 · cumulative return
July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2026 · annualized return
July 1, 2021 – June 30, 2026 · annualized return
No name, email, or documents required. Your return stays on this page.
02 / Put the number in context
Endowments & Foundations peers
15.31%
1-year peer median · June 30, 2026
Where does your return sit?
See the middle 50% of peers, your estimated standing, and questions for your committee. Explore an example to see how it works.
Peer data from OCIO Analytics. Useful context however your portfolio is managed; the comparison universe is OCIO-managed institutional accounts.
Your portfolio comparison
Your place in the peer range
Each period has its own eligible peer sample. These overlapping periods are context, not independent tests of consistency.
Allocation, liquidity needs, and investment objectives can explain differences. Use this as a starting point for questions about your portfolio.
OCIO Analytics peer data · Alpha Nasdaq OCIO Indices · June 30, 2026 · Explore all index results →
Peer ranges and medians come from the OCIO Analytics Portfolio Checkup dataset for the selected institutional or allocation cohort. Each period includes only accounts with a complete quarterly return history. Long-term returns are geometrically compounded and annualized. The eligible peer sample changes by period.
The shaded band shows the middle 50% of peer returns. The chart spans the 5th to 95th return percentiles; returns outside that range appear at the corresponding edge. Estimated peer rank follows Portfolio Checkup's convention: 1st is highest, 100th is lowest, with approximately two-percentile resolution. It is an estimate from aggregate distributions, not an exact account rank. We show peer standing only with at least 20 eligible portfolios.
The published index is an equally weighted average, distinct from the peer median. Its basis-point difference is your return minus the index return (100 basis points equals one percentage point). Neither comparison adjusts for risk or establishes provider quality.
Published index inclusion criteria require U.S.-based clients, fully discretionary OCIO mandates, account size of at least $50 million, and live performance net of all fees; defined contribution accounts are excluded. Account size, asset allocation, private-asset valuation timing, liquidity needs, and investment objectives can limit comparability. Positive relative results do not establish that a portfolio is appropriate.
Quarterly, year-to-date, and one-year returns are cumulative; periods of three years or longer are annualized. All periods end June 30, 2026. Source: OCIO Analytics aggregate peer performance and AlphaNasdaq OCIO Index Deliverable 2Q26 workbook. Entered returns stay in this browser page and are not sent with interaction analytics.
Direct answer
The Alpha Nasdaq OCIO Index is a family of benchmarks measuring actual institutional OCIO portfolio outcomes using a consistent methodology, net-of-fee reporting, risk-based universes, and client-level data. It gives asset owners and providers a more relevant reference point than a generic stock-and-bond benchmark.
Alpha Capital and Nasdaq created the index to improve transparency and make OCIO performance more comparable across institutions. Learn more on Nasdaq
Quarter ending June 30, 2026
The Alpha Nasdaq OCIO Index family includes 10 OCIO benchmarks; the table also includes five reference benchmarks. Returns are shown as percentages and are annualized except MRQ and YTD. A dash indicates that there are too few observations to calculate a result.
| Index | MRQ | YTD | 1 year | 3 years | 5 years | 7 years | 10 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broad Market Index | 6.62 | 5.61 | 12.29 | 11.04 | 5.22 | 7.49 | 7.65 |
| Defined Benefit Pension Plans Index | 4.87 | 4.03 | 9.04 | 8.54 | 2.91 | 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Endowments & Foundations Index | 7.67 | 6.51 | 14.46 | 12.54 | 6.77 | 8.81 | 8.74 |
| Healthcare Operating Reserves Index | 7.39 | 6.68 | 13.92 | 11.66 | 5.95 | 7.73 | — |
| Insurance Reserves Index | 5.39 | 4.51 | 10.33 | 10.83 | 5.26 | — | — |
| Aggressive Allocation Index | 9.23 | 7.76 | 16.04 | 13.61 | 7.55 | 10.25 | — |
| Moderate Aggressive Allocation Index | 8.79 | 7.64 | 15.83 | 13.10 | 7.19 | 9.44 | 9.34 |
| Moderate Allocation Index | 7.12 | 5.98 | 13.48 | 11.99 | 5.90 | 7.98 | 8.09 |
| Moderate Conservative Allocation Index | 4.10 | 3.34 | 8.14 | 8.04 | 2.47 | 4.79 | 5.48 |
| Conservative Allocation Index | 2.11 | 1.56 | 4.66 | 4.88 | 0.05 | 2.21 | 3.17 |
| MSCI ACWI | 15.06 | 11.49 | 24.16 | 20.22 | 11.49 | 13.81 | 13.33 |
| S&P 500 | 15.20 | 10.21 | 22.33 | 20.61 | 13.41 | 16.08 | 15.51 |
| Bloomberg US Aggregate | 0.67 | 0.62 | 3.79 | 4.16 | 0.08 | 1.22 | 1.54 |
| 60% MSCI ACWI / 40% Bloomberg US Aggregate | 9.22 | 7.21 | 15.81 | 13.68 | 6.96 | 8.86 | 8.70 |
| 60% S&P 500 / 40% Bloomberg US Aggregate | 9.31 | 6.45 | 14.76 | 13.92 | 8.10 | 10.19 | 9.98 |
Source: AlphaNasdaq OCIO Index Deliverable 2Q26 workbook, Performance Results worksheet, as of June 30, 2026.
Use the filters to view one reporting period at a time.
July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2026 · Cumulative return · 10 OCIO indices
Shared bar scale: 0% to 20%
These benchmarks reflect different mandates and allocations. Differences between them do not rank provider quality.
A consistent OCIO benchmark framework
Participating firms provide client-level data in a common format using a published methodology.
Results compare OCIO portfolios on a consistent, net-of-fee basis segmented by client and risk characteristics.
Alpha Capital and Nasdaq developed the index with input and data from leading OCIO organizations.
Participating firms
The Alpha Nasdaq OCIO Index draws client-level data from a broad cross-section of participating OCIO firms.
A useful first conversation
Discuss the allocation, risk, and reporting context behind an OCIO performance comparison. Start with one question; no documents or search decision required.